-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#review34745
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for this Tom. I will get this committed, once the raised issues are 
addressed.


docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment64991>

    kill white space.



docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment64992>

    kill white space.



docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment64996>

    s/leader,/leader/



docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment64997>

    s/leader,/leader./ ?



docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment65000>

    Kill WS.
    
    Also this sentence doesn't read correctly to me. Can we rephrase this?
    
    How about?
    
    Masters enter leaderless state irrespective of whether they are a leader or 
not before the disconnection.



docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment65002>

    s/, connected to ZooKeeeper,//



docs/high-availability.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/#comment65005>

    This is giving away too much of the internals. How about?
    
    Otherwise, the disconnected backup waits to reconnect with ZooKeeper and 
possibly get elected as the new leading master.


- Vinod Kone


On Feb. 14, 2014, 11:50 p.m., Tom Galloway wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 11:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Dave Lester and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Updated version of high availability doc.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/high-availability.md 77af5d5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18155/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tom Galloway
> 
>

Reply via email to