> On March 24, 2014, 4:20 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/master/master.hpp, line 421
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/diff/1/?file=526626#file526626line421>
> >
> >     We should really s/deactivated/removed/ and maybe s/activated/active/ 
> > above as well?

Sounds good, I will do this in a follow up to minimize the diff. We came across 
the poor naming during one of Adam's patches as well.


> On March 24, 2014, 4:20 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/master/master.cpp, lines 751-753
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/diff/1/?file=526627#file526627line751>
> >
> >     When does this happen? How about a comment?

It can't happen, but if it does (by programmer mistake), I want it to be a 
failure. Would you like a comment or is that clear from the Failure message?


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/#review37792
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 21, 2014, 12:56 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 21, 2014, 12:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-764
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-764
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This implements the Registry-backed Master, with the following exceptions 
> that will be addressed in follow up changes:
> 
> -Note that the --registry_strict flag is enforced to be false in 
> master/main.cpp.
> -Reconciliation remains unimplemented as before.
> -Improvements can be made to killTask, specifically we should add SlaveID to 
> the message in order to drop fewer requests for unknown slaves.
> -Orthogonally, this does not address MESOS-682.
> 
> I've updated 'deactivated' slaves to be a cache of SlaveIDs rather than UPIDs 
> as this was the intent originally (we were concerned about the unbounded 
> growth of the set, but cache<SlaveID, Nothing> keeps a fixed capacity).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/constants.hpp cdaaad060d4ee777f8b0838b63c0fd031da861ea 
>   src/master/constants.cpp 18548834468243bef8ae090f70363e2b9f571ac5 
>   src/master/master.hpp a37a2a2fa3713b8251eb318dfb45e0793cb344ff 
>   src/master/master.cpp 3b28f72be2016997e30649d2b12ed0e8f1a57dd5 
>   src/messages/messages.proto c26a3d0e69bbbd447c859cf175c139ab8948fde2 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp d8d3e0fa54972201d72b2650ec0ba922a4912d54 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This change preserves the previous semantics and so all existing tests pass.
> 
> This is because the Registrar can only operate in a "non-strict" manner.
> 
> An unfortunate effect of this change is that many tests run slower due to the 
> fact that messages are dropped while we're recovering, an alternative 
> approach here would be to re-enqueue *all* incoming messages through 
> recover(). However, this adds queuing delay to each message processed in the 
> Master and the performance implications of this are not well understood for 
> large clusters.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to