> On March 24, 2014, 4:20 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > src/master/master.hpp, line 421 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/diff/1/?file=526626#file526626line421> > > > > We should really s/deactivated/removed/ and maybe s/activated/active/ > > above as well?
Sounds good, I will do this in a follow up to minimize the diff. We came across the poor naming during one of Adam's patches as well. > On March 24, 2014, 4:20 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > src/master/master.cpp, lines 751-753 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/diff/1/?file=526627#file526627line751> > > > > When does this happen? How about a comment? It can't happen, but if it does (by programmer mistake), I want it to be a failure. Would you like a comment or is that clear from the Failure message? - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/#review37792 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 21, 2014, 12:56 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 21, 2014, 12:56 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-764 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-764 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > This implements the Registry-backed Master, with the following exceptions > that will be addressed in follow up changes: > > -Note that the --registry_strict flag is enforced to be false in > master/main.cpp. > -Reconciliation remains unimplemented as before. > -Improvements can be made to killTask, specifically we should add SlaveID to > the message in order to drop fewer requests for unknown slaves. > -Orthogonally, this does not address MESOS-682. > > I've updated 'deactivated' slaves to be a cache of SlaveIDs rather than UPIDs > as this was the intent originally (we were concerned about the unbounded > growth of the set, but cache<SlaveID, Nothing> keeps a fixed capacity). > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/constants.hpp cdaaad060d4ee777f8b0838b63c0fd031da861ea > src/master/constants.cpp 18548834468243bef8ae090f70363e2b9f571ac5 > src/master/master.hpp a37a2a2fa3713b8251eb318dfb45e0793cb344ff > src/master/master.cpp 3b28f72be2016997e30649d2b12ed0e8f1a57dd5 > src/messages/messages.proto c26a3d0e69bbbd447c859cf175c139ab8948fde2 > src/slave/slave.cpp d8d3e0fa54972201d72b2650ec0ba922a4912d54 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19383/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > This change preserves the previous semantics and so all existing tests pass. > > This is because the Registrar can only operate in a "non-strict" manner. > > An unfortunate effect of this change is that many tests run slower due to the > fact that messages are dropped while we're recovering, an alternative > approach here would be to re-enqueue *all* incoming messages through > recover(). However, this adds queuing delay to each message processed in the > Master and the performance implications of this are not well understood for > large clusters. > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >