> On April 1, 2014, 4:57 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> > src/master/master.hpp, line 390
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/19006/diff/4/?file=537795#file537795line390>
> >
> >     What about the use of activated/deactivated here? Can we have 
> > 'connected', 'disconnected', and 'removed' where 'removed' will eventually 
> > be removed (no pun intended) once the registrar is fully in place?

Filed new JIRA MESOS-1188 to "Rename slaves/frameworks.activated/deactivated". 
We can discuss naming suggestions there.


- Adam


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19006/#review39219
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 26, 2014, 9:41 p.m., Adam B wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/19006/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 26, 2014, 9:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-804
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-804
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Moved code to disconnect a checkpointing slave out of Master::exited() and 
> into a new disconnect(Slave), to be re-used by slave authentication code.
> Also renamed deactivateSlave() to shutdownSlave(), since it actually sends a 
> ShutdownMessage and calls removeSlave(). This avoids confusion with 
> deactivateFramework, which is more analagous to disconnect(Slave).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.hpp b6b9983 
>   src/master/master.cpp 5d0ddb0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19006/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adam B
> 
>

Reply via email to