> On April 7, 2014, 5:15 p.m., Ian Downes wrote: > > src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp, lines 438-441 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/diff/2/?file=550552#file550552line438> > > > > How about being very specific: > > "The slave should expose which containerization mechanism(s) it > > supports to avoid scheduling tasks that it cannot run."
Yes, that is much better. Thanks! - Till ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/#review39696 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 11, 2014, 2:57 a.m., Till Toenshoff wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 11, 2014, 2:57 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ian Downes, Niklas Nielsen, and > Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Introduces the ContainerInfo protobuf as part of CommandInfo. > Right now, if present, the mesos containerizer fails the task launch to point > out that we do not support it on that containerizer. > > This will be needed for the ExternalContainerizer and possibly other > containerizers as well. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 37f8a7f > src/slave/containerizer/mesos_containerizer.cpp c819c97 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20080/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Till Toenshoff > >
