----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20383/ -----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. Repository: mesos-git Description ------- We would like a non-strict registry to be "write-only" in the sense that we do not take "actions" based on the state of the registry. What this means for recovery is that we should ensure that we don't inform frameworks of lost slaves when they do not re-register after recovery. This preserves the old "stateless" master semantics. Diffs ----- src/master/master.cpp 3c3c989543167afb7d368a19a16457ed00e6be0c Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20383/diff/ Testing ------- Will follow up with an integration test as I make the LogStorage updates to the testing abstractions. Unfortunately, this case will be a bit tricky to test since we're expecting the *absence* of a lost message. Thanks, Ben Mahler
