-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/#review41853
-----------------------------------------------------------


You can disregard the ReviewBot failure in ExternalContainerizerTest. That is a 
known bug that is actively being worked on.
Your change looks pretty good to me. I just have a few style comments for 
starters.


3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/base64.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/#comment75490>

    __STOUT_BASE64_HPP__



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/base64.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/#comment75491>

    namespace stout



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/base64.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/#comment75492>

    Irregular comment style. I think we usually prefer // comments over 
/*block*/ comments



3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/base64_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/#comment75493>

    Please add the standard copyright/license comment block at the top of each 
file.


- Adam B


On April 30, 2014, 2 a.m., Isabel Jimenez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 30, 2014, 2 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Benjamin Hindman.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1131
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1131
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> 1st Phase following Ben's comments on https://reviews.apache.org/r/19575/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/Makefile.am 7faa562 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/include/stout/base64.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/3rdparty/stout/tests/base64_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20885/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Isabel Jimenez
> 
>

Reply via email to