> On May 2, 2014, 12:21 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > src/log/replica.cpp, lines 579-595 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/20934/diff/1/?file=572042#file572042line579> > > > > Is this TODO still relevant or can it now be a NOTE to complement your > > comment above, because we're now handling it properly? > > > > In other words, is there something left "to do" here?
Changed it to NOTE. - Jie ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20934/#review41983 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 1, 2014, 12:36 a.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/20934/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 1, 2014, 12:36 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1271 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1271 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/log/replica.cpp d566b24 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20934/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Jie Yu > >
