----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#review49580 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Some minor feedback, but I think it's about ready to commit. I'll let @vinodkone (shepherd) give the final word. src/slave/slave.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86807> Remove the space before ',' since it should immediately follow the frameworkId. src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86808> Times(1) is unnecessary/implicit; remove. src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86817> Why change the resources in the offer itself? src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86818> Move this down to the createTask/tasks.push_back section. It's confusing just under the "Wait for offers" comment. Ditto for the other tests. src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86809> Times(1) is unnecessary src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86810> Unnecessary src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86811> Do you really need to settle before AND after you advance? src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86812> Unnecessary src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86813> Why are you modifying the offer object here? src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86814> Unnecessary src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86815> Comment should be updated to match this test. src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86816> I'm not sure the Times(2) is being enforced if you follow it with WillRepeatedly. Maybe you should do .WillOnce(RUNNING).WillOnce(RUNNING) instead. src/tests/slave_tests.cpp <https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/#comment86819> Why change the resources offered? - Adam B On July 29, 2014, 2:05 p.m., Yifan Gu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 29, 2014, 2:05 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Ian Downes and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-886 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-886 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Added __runTask() to wait for the completion of containerizer->update() and > check the result before sending RunTaskMessage. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/slave.hpp a896bb6 > src/slave/slave.cpp 1d56918 > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp e45255a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22313/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > SlaveTest, CancelTaskIfContainerizerFails > > Which tests that if the containerizer->update() return a Failure, the task > won't be launched and the scheduler will get TASK_LOST. > > make check > > > File Attachments > ---------------- > > framework will exit > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/fbe73273-7aa9-4faa-b1c5-003ab03042a9__issue-886.diff > log > > https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/06/18/84d801a0-5c2a-4bb9-901b-e1962031461c__log > > > Thanks, > > Yifan Gu > >
