> On Sept. 27, 2014, 1:17 a.m., Adam B wrote: > > src/master/master.cpp, line 3173 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25184/diff/2/?file=681985#file681985line3173> > > > > Update Brenden's TODO, since you're now wiping the data field. > > I'm not sure if we really want to wipe the message field, especially > > for terminal states that could be monitored by an external process (not the > > framework). > > Timothy Chen wrote: > Is the message field being used at all though?
I didn't go through message field yet, I think it's fine to let this patch focus on data field because it did introduced problems. - Chengwei ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25184/#review54698 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 9, 2014, 10 p.m., Chengwei Yang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/25184/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 9, 2014, 10 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B and Timothy St. Clair. > > > Bugs: MESOS-1746 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1746 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > There was a bug found that Spark use TaskStatus.data to transfer computed > result and mesos-master RES memory keeps increasing fast and finally will be > killed by OOM killer. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/master.cpp cb46cec0674b3aa031450c5b4f48f4f8bb92767d > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25184/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > tested with spark > > > Thanks, > > Chengwei Yang > >
