> On Oct. 14, 2014, 7:49 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > docs/home.md, line 10 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26670/diff/1/?file=719855#file719855line10> > > > > What goes in this section vs "Developing Mesos Frameworks and > > Applications" section. Shouldn't reconciliation be part of the latter? > > > > Maybe we can pull "Mesos Architecture" up here and move reconciliation > > to "Developing..."? > > > > Also kill WIP. It's always going to be WIP :)
Yes great point, I'll move this and move the architecture and talks up here. - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26670/#review56563 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 14, 2014, 12:36 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/26670/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 14, 2014, 12:36 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Niklas Nielsen, and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-681 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-681 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > Hoping to have a section called "Mesos Fundamentals", where we can place > other fundamental documents, for example: > > Background / Idea > Resource Offers > Executors / Tasks > Status Updates > > Thoughts? > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/home.md 2efe37ed14c5fbc6dfc0d7a2587752493f157350 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26670/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > N/A > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
