> On Jan. 16, 2015, 12:42 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.hpp, lines 22-30
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29688/diff/6/?file=821620#file821620line22>
> >
> >     Do you want future, option, and resources included?
> 
> Jie Yu wrote:
>     Those are part of the IsolatorProcess interfaces (which must have been 
> defined in isolator.hpp). So I do not include them here.

I thought so, and that sounds fine, but FWIW I don't think we've been relying 
on transitive includes at all as they are prone to drift.


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29688/#review68314
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 14, 2015, 8:28 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29688/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 14, 2015, 8:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, and Ian Downes.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-1588
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1588
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added DiskQuotaIsolator to enforce disk quota. I created a DiskUsageChecker 
> to check disk usage by calling 'du'. The DiskUsageChecker is throttled (see 
> comments). The isolator uses DiskUsageChecker to enforce disk quota.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/Makefile.am fc0c3227466ccf364353a739fec8d9532ea3c683 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> 0bcf5ce7cfab470cabd3af3535344d19cb33b1c8 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp f1b8dfbb7391167b67a9498561742aa9ab9089a6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29688/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to