-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/#review74359
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/linux/fs.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/#comment120926>

    Can you also adjust the comment here because the source can be a directory 
as well (in the case of bind mount).



src/linux/fs.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/#comment120927>

    I guess you need to explain what does a "dummy argument" mean here. It gets 
a little confusing initially and I need to look into documents to find out what 
does that mean.
    
    Maybe say that source is optional. If not specified, it means xxx.



src/linux/fs.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/#comment120928>

    Ditto above. Maybe just say that file system type is optional.
    
    Also, can you do a sweep in the code base to replace "none" with None()? I 
think we did use "none" in some cases for bind mounts.



src/linux/fs.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/#comment120929>

    I think we can just return ErrnoError() here. It's caller's responsibility 
to print all arguments.



src/linux/fs.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/#comment120930>

    Ditto here. No need to print 'target'.


- Jie Yu


On Feb. 25, 2015, 10:31 p.m., Ian Downes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 25, 2015, 10:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Dominic Hamon and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Accept dummy arguments for fs::mount().
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/fs.hpp ac8b5f416dae0a9388a3839b6f078abdcd42edae 
>   src/linux/fs.cpp b01d14c3a1b296566b2b17a7f540097bd7cc53dd 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31443/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ian Downes
> 
>

Reply via email to