----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/#review76764 -----------------------------------------------------------
include/mesos/mesos.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/#comment124431> Are you saying "Resources cannot be reserved for '*' role"? Or there is more information that it's hard for me to understand? Q about design: why a framework from role `'*'` cannot reserve resources? include/mesos/mesos.proto <https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/#comment124430> s/static/statically ? - Alexander Rukletsov On March 17, 2015, 3:19 a.m., Michael Park wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 17, 2015, 3:19 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Alexander Rukletsov, Ben Mahler, and Jie Yu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2475 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2475 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > The beginning of `Resource::ReservationInfo`. This patch only introduces the > `framework_id` field. We don't need the required `principal` field yet and > will be introduced together with the "unreserve" ACLs. An optional `id` may > be introduced in the future as well. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/mesos.proto 9df972d750ce1e4a81d2e96cc508d6f83cad2fc8 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32139/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Michael Park > >
