> On March 18, 2015, 11:05 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 406
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/37/?file=897704#file897704line406>
> >
> >     Do we call fetch even if we don't have anything to fetch? I think it 
> > will be a good idea to have a fast return if there is nothing to be fetched.

There is a check for this in Fetcher::fetch(). No need to even dispatch the 
call to the process either if there is nothing to fetch.


> On March 18, 2015, 11:05 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 491
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/37/?file=897704#file897704line491>
> >
> >     Why not just mock _fetch and do a barrier on it by giving it a promise 
> > in test?

"just mock _fetch" is more work and harder to understand.

It would also function, but then you would need to touch test code every time 
you change _fetch(). Furthermore, it would not be as clear why we wait for this 
particular call.


> On March 18, 2015, 11:05 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 503
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/37/?file=897704#file897704line503>
> >
> >     Since this is only called in one place, how about put this in ___fetch, 
> > pass it the future and check if it failed log it there?

How would this be simpler and more readable?

What is wrong with abstracting functions that are called only once? Doing so 
saves a comment / pulls what would have been a comment into code!


> On March 18, 2015, 11:05 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 518
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/37/?file=897704#file897704line518>
> >
> >     In what scenario should a cache entry not exist?
> >     If it doesn't somehow we won't be able to use it too?

As you can see at the call sites, this method is used in scenarios where 
fetching succeeded, where it failed, and incidentally where it left a partial 
download lying around. I added this comment:

  // We may or may not have started downloading. The download may or may
  // not have been partial. In any case, clean up whatever is there.
  
If there is no file, that's fine. Then we tried fetching and failed before 
starting to write the file. 

In any case, we remove the cache entry and the space amount it had 
reserved/claimed is released for later use.


> On March 18, 2015, 11:05 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 521
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/37/?file=897704#file897704line521>
> >
> >     Feel like this can be in a infintie loop, where if we can expire one 
> > item then forever other fetch items will get stuck?
> >     I wonder if we should have some remedy action, or simply crash too?

This is not a loop, because the cache entry gets removed BEFORE we attempt to 
delete the file. See line 500 just above.

However, just in case future changed code were ever to call this method several 
times on the same entry, I added a line that sets the entry's size field to 
zero. This way, accounted cache space is only released once.


> On March 18, 2015, 11:05 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 726
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/37/?file=897704#file897704line726>
> >
> >     Why ignore error?

The code that follows this line as of line 712 handles the error case.


- Bernd


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/#review76902
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 17, 2015, 6:59 a.m., Bernd Mathiske wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 17, 2015, 6:59 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Till Toenshoff, and 
> Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2057, MESOS-2069, MESOS-2070, MESOS-2072, MESOS-2073, and 
> MESOS-2074
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2057
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2069
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2070
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2072
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2073
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2074
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Almost all of the functionality in epic MESOS-336. Downloaded files from 
> CommandInfo::URIs can now be cached in a cache directory designated by a 
> slave flag. This only happens when asked for by an extra flag in the URI and 
> is thus backwards-compatible. The cache has a size limit also given by a new 
> slave flag. Cache-resident files are evicted as necessary to make space for 
> newly fetched ones. Concurrent attempts to cache the same URI leads to only 
> one download. The fetcher program remains external for safety reasons, but is 
> now augmented with more elaborate parameters packed into a JSON object to 
> implement specific fetch actions for all of the above. Additional testing 
> includes fetching from (mock) HDFS and coverage of the new features.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/configuration.md 7119b1421ac1506fa118e9f91d07e027dec3d92e 
>   docs/fetcher-cache-internals.md PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/fetcher.md PRE-CREATION 
>   include/mesos/fetcher/fetcher.proto 
> 311af9aebc6a85dadba9dbeffcf7036b70896bcc 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto ec8efaec13f54a56d82411f6cdbdb8ad8b103748 
>   src/Makefile.am 7a06c7028eca8164b1f5fdea6a7ecd37ee6826bb 
>   src/hdfs/hdfs.hpp 968545d9af896f3e72e156484cc58135405cef6b 
>   src/launcher/fetcher.cpp 796526f59c25898ef6db2b828b0e2bb7b172ba25 
>   src/slave/constants.hpp fd1c1aba0aa62372ab399bee5709ce81b8e92cec 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp b7bf54ac65d6c61622e485ac253513eaac2e4f88 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 5f4b4ce49a9523e4743e5c79da4050e6f9e29ed7 
>   src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.hpp 
> 1db0eaf002c8d0eaf4e0391858e61e0912b35829 
>   src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp 
> 9e9e9d0eb6b0801d53dec3baea32a4cd4acdd5e2 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 
> ae61a0fcd19f2ba808624312401f020121baf5d4 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp 
> fbd1c0a0e5f4f227adb022f0baaa6d2c7e3ad748 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp dbaf5f532d0bc65a6d16856b8ffcc2c06a98f1fa 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 0f99e4efb8fa2b96f120a3e49191158ca0364c06 
>   src/tests/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 06cd3d89ecbaaac17ae6970604b21fbe29f6e887 
>   src/tests/fetcher_cache_tests.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp 4549e6a631e2c17cec3766efaa556593eeac9a1e 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 45e35204d1aa876fa0c871acf0f21afcd5ababe8 
>   src/tests/mesos.cpp c8f43d21b214e75eaac2870cbdf4f03fd18707d1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30774/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> --- longer Description: ---
> 
> -Replaces all other reviews for the fetcher cache except those related to 
> stout: 30006, 30033, 30034, 30036, 30037, 30039, 30124, 30173, 30614, 30616, 
> 30618, 30621, 30626. See descriptions of those. In dependency order:
> 
> 30033: Removes the fetcher env tests since these won't be needed any more 
> when the fetcher uses JSON in a single env var as a parameter. They never 
> tested anything that won't be covered by other tests anyway.
> 
> 30034: Makes the code structure of all fetcher tests the same. Instead of 
> calling the run method of the fetcher directly, calling through fetch(). Also 
> removes all uses of I/O redirection, which is not really needed for 
> debugging, and thus the next patch can refactor fetch() and run(). (The 
> latter comes in two varieties, which complicates matters without much 
> benefit.)
> 
> 30036: Extends the CommandInfo::URI protobuf with a boolean "caching" field 
> that will later cause fetcher cache actions. Also introduces the notion of a 
> cache directory to the fetcher info protobuf. And then propagates these 
> additions throughout the rest of the code base where applicable. This 
> includes passing the slave ID all the way down to the place where the cache 
> dir name is constructed.
> 
> 30037: Extends the fetcher info protobuf with "actions" (fetch directly 
> bypassing the cache, fetch through the cache, retrieve from the cache). 
> Switches the basis for dealing with uris to "items", which contain the uri, 
> the action, and potentially a cache file name. Refactors fetch() and run(), 
> so there is only one of each. Introduces about half of the actual cache 
> logic, including a hashmap of cache file objects for bookkeeping and basic 
> operations on it. 
> 
> 30039: Enables fetcher cache actions in the mesos fetcher program.
> 
> 30006: Enables concurrent downloading into the fetcher cache. Reuse of 
> download results in the cache when multiple fetcher runs occur concurrently. 
> 
> 30614: This is to ensure that all this refactoring of fetcher code has not 
> broken HDFS fetching. Adds a test that exercises the C++ code paths in Mesos 
> and mesos-fetcher related to fetching from HDFS. Uses a mock HDFS client 
> written in bash that acts just like a real "hadoop" command if used in the 
> right limited way.
> 
> 30124: Inserted fetcher cache zap upon slave startup, recovery and shutdown. 
> This implements recovery in an acceptable, yet most simple way.
> 
> 30173: Created fetcher cache tests. Adds a new test source file containing a 
> test fixture and tests to find out if the fetcher cache works with a variety 
> of settings.
> 
> 30616: Adds hdfs::du() which calls "hadoop fs -du -h" and returns a string 
> that contains the file size for the URI passed as argument. This is needed to 
> determine the size of a file on HDFS before downloading it to the fetcher 
> cache (to ensure there is enough space).
> 
> 30621: Refactored URI type separation in mesos-fetcher. Moved the URI type 
> separation code (distinguishes http, hdfs, local copying, etc.) from 
> mesos-fetcher to the fetcher process/actor, since it is going to be reused by 
> download size queries when we introduce fetcher cache management. Also 
> factored out URI validation, which will be used the same way by mesos-fetcher 
> and the fetcher process/actor.
> 
> 30626: Fetcher cache eviction. This happens when the cache does not have 
> enough space to accomodate upcoming downloads to the cache. Necessary 
> provisions included here:
> - mesos-fetcher does not run until evictions have been successful
> - Cache space is reserved while (async) waiting for eviction to succeed. If 
> it fails, the reservation gets undone.
> - Reservations can be partly from available space, partly from evictions. All 
> math included :-)
> - To find out how much space is needed, downloading has a prelude in which we 
> query the download size from the URI. This works for all URI types that 
> mesos-fetcher currently supports, including http and hdfs.
> - Size-determination requests are now synchronized, too. Only one per URI in 
> play happens.
> - There is cleanup code for all kinds of error situations. At the very end of 
> the fetch attempt, each list is processed for undoing things like space 
> reservations and eviction disabling.
> - Eviction gets disabled for URIs that are currently in use, i.e. the related 
> cache files are. We use reference counting for this, since there may be 
> concurrent fetch attempts using the same cache files.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bernd Mathiske
> 
>

Reply via email to