-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32419/#review77657
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/common/http.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/32419/#comment125809>

    Just a suggestion for an alternative pattern here.
    
    Rather than
    
    ```
    {
      JSON::Array array;
      array.values.reserve(size);
      /* Fill in array... */
      object.values["statuses"] = std::move(array);
    }
    ```
    
    How about:
    
    ```
    {
      JSON::Array &array = object.values["statuses"];
      array.values.reserve(size);
      /* Fill in array... */
    }
    ```
    
    Seems to me like this code is just as readable and doing no work is better 
than doing some work.


- Michael Park


On March 24, 2015, 12:27 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/32419/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 24, 2015, 12:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2353
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2353
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a simple attempt at improvement for MESOS-2353 in the interim of 
> writing a more comprehensive JSON benchmark.
> 
> Per the discussion on [r/31700](https://reviews.apache.org/r/31700/), moves 
> here avoid the very expensive copies of the large JSON objects so long as 
> variant has move assignment defined (or generated) and our objects have move 
> generated.
> 
> It appears that variant has move assignment and our json classes can have 
> move assignment generated, so this should help.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/common/http.cpp d3b7ca3727567ff252f978720f518ad0912e533b 
>   src/master/http.cpp e1a87d646e9690e39a9e84ae383622018ce80401 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32419/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> No benchmarking performed given the analysis from Michael in 
> [r/31700](https://reviews.apache.org/r/31700/). I will also be trying this 
> out on our large production clusters.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to