Try to use "Resolved" instead of "Closed" if it was fixed / taken care of, etc. Also, with Resolved you don't need to re-open to make certain changes.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the tickets that I was involved in: > > The following tickets were open, so I went ahead and updated the type. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2475 > <http://goog_705696099> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2476 > <http://goog_705696099> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2477 > <http://goog_705696099> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2139 > <http://goog_705696099> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2658 > > The following tickets are closed, so I'm not sure if I should re-open them > only to re-close them with a different type. > Perhaps someone with a magic button can update these tickets' type to > *Task*? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2263 > <http://goog_705696102> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2265 > <http://goog_705696102> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2264 > <http://goog_705696102> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2266 > > Thanks, > > MPark. > > > On 13 May 2015 at 17:13, Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for clarifying Jake! Marco / Ben, can you guys audit the "type" of >> the tickets that were mass transitioned to bugs? Many of these are not >> bugs >> :( >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Marco Massenzio <ma...@mesosphere.io> >> wrote: >> >> > +benh - who can explain the rationale. >> > >> > *Marco Massenzio* >> > *Distributed Systems Engineer* >> >> > >> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hey Ben >> >> Yes, subtasks and technical tasks where removed from the Mesos project >> in >> >> jira per an infra ticket requesting this. These all had to be hand >> edited >> >> as jira does not allow bulk editing of subtasks so all subtasks where >> run >> >> though and in the process they where converted to issues with the >> default >> >> issue type of 'bug'. >> >> >> >> -Jake >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Benjamin Mahler < >> >> benjamin.mah...@gmail.com >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > +jake >> >> > >> >> > We received a large number of emails about ticket transitions. It >> looks >> >> > like they were all subtasks that were mass converted to bugs? Many of >> >> these >> >> > are not "bugs", e.g. this one, so I'm curious what caused this? Were >> >> > subtask tickets disabled for the mesos project? >> >> > >> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >> > From: Jake Farrell (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> >> >> > Date: Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:17 PM >> >> > Subject: [jira] [Updated] (MESOS-1280) Add replace task primitive >> >> > To: iss...@mesos.apache.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > [ >> >> > >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> >> > ] >> >> > >> >> > Jake Farrell updated MESOS-1280: >> >> > -------------------------------- >> >> > Issue Type: Bug (was: Sub-task) >> >> > Parent: (was: MESOS-938) >> >> > >> >> > > Add replace task primitive >> >> > > -------------------------- >> >> > > >> >> > > Key: MESOS-1280 >> >> > > URL: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1280 >> >> > > Project: Mesos >> >> > > Issue Type: Bug >> >> > > Components: c++ api, master, slave >> >> > > Reporter: Niklas Quarfot Nielsen >> >> > > >> >> > > Also along the lines of MESOS-938, replaceTask would one of a >> couple >> >> of >> >> > primitives needed to support various task replacement and scaling >> >> > scenarios. This replaceTask() version is significantly simpler than >> the >> >> > first proposed one; it's only responsibility is to run a new task >> info >> >> on a >> >> > running tasks resources. >> >> > > The running task will be killed as usual, but the newly freed >> >> resources >> >> > will never be announced and the new task will run on them instead. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >> >> > (v6.3.4#6332) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >