We had an internal discussion about this. White-listing constexpr is fine by us. I think technically the google style guide allows c++11 features that are not explicitly disallowed, but it doesn't hurt to add it to the style guide :-)
Joris On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Paul Brett <[email protected]> wrote: > Despite best efforts to avoid non-POD static variables, we appear to still > have over 80 instances (see MESOS-2780). We can, of course, use const > inline functions to address these but this will change each constant > reference at the calling site to a constant function reference. > > A more natural approach provided by C++11 is to use constexpr. I have > submitted for review (https://reviews.apache.org/r/34782/) an example to > address the TC handle. > > What are the views on whitelisting constexpr? > > -- Paul Brett >
