Does this not satisfy the usecase? ->
https://github.com/ClusterHQ/mesos-module-flocker

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Timothy Chen <tnac...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tommy,
>
> We didn't modify MesosContainerizer container creation but only just
> added image support and the ability to inherit runtime configuration
> from images.
>
> We're considering different options like runc for OCI but still just
> investigating, if you have any more thoughts let us know!
>
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:05 AM, tommy xiao <xia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > interesting on the MesosContainerizer's design, what technology to
> support
> > it? runC solution?
> >
> > 2015-11-25 19:09 GMT+08:00 Timothy Chen <tnac...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> DockerContainerizer doesn't support isolators simply because we
> >> delegate all container creation to Docker via docker client, and
> >> therefore we don't have a way to run our isolators that's in
> >> mesos-slave from docker.
> >>
> >> We're working on unified containerizer that brings Docker images to
> >> Mesos Containerizer, so you can launch containers with docker images
> >> with it. There is a working initial code that's already in master that
> >> you can try out, and once you have the isolator you can then launch
> >> containers with docker images with your new isolator with
> >> MesosContainerizer.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Frank Scholten <fr...@frankscholten.nl
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > We (Frank Scholten and Phil Winder) are currently developing the Mesos
> >> > Flocker framework. As part of this framework we want to develop a
> >> > custom isolator module which interacts with the Flocker Control
> >> > Service.
> >> >
> >> > After creating a simple stub isolator and installing it on one of the
> >> > agents we noticed it gets picked up we run a regular task but it does
> >> > not get picked up when we run a Docker container.
> >> >
> >> > To us it seems that this is because isolators can only be used by the
> >> > MesosContainerizer. The MesosContainerizer configures isolation in its
> >> > create factory method while the DockerContainerizes does not:
> >> >
> >> > MesosContainerizer
> >> >
> >> > Try<MesosContainerizer*> MesosContainerizer::create(
> >> >     const Flags& flags,
> >> >     bool local,
> >> >     Fetcher* fetcher)
> >> > {
> >> >   string isolation;
> >> >
> >> >   if (flags.isolation == "process") {
> >> >     LOG(WARNING) << "The 'process' isolation flag is deprecated, "
> >> >                  << "please update your flags to"
> >> >                  << " '--isolation=posix/cpu,posix/mem'.";
> >> >
> >> >     isolation = "posix/cpu,posix/mem";
> >> >   } else if (flags.isolation == "cgroups") {
> >> >     LOG(WARNING) << "The 'cgroups' isolation flag is deprecated, "
> >> >                  << "please update your flags to"
> >> >                  << " '--isolation=cgroups/cpu,cgroups/mem'.";
> >> >
> >> >     isolation = "cgroups/cpu,cgroups/mem";
> >> >   } else {
> >> >     isolation = flags.isolation;
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> > DockerContainerizer
> >> >
> >> > Try<DockerContainerizer*> DockerContainerizer::create(
> >> >     const Flags& flags,
> >> >     Fetcher* fetcher)
> >> > {
> >> >   Try<Docker*> create = Docker::create(flags.docker,
> >> flags.docker_socket, true);
> >> >   if (create.isError()) {
> >> >     return Error("Failed to create docker: " + create.error());
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> >   Shared<Docker> docker(create.get());
> >> >
> >> >   if (flags.docker_mesos_image.isSome()) {
> >> >     Try<Nothing> validateResult = docker->validateVersion(Version(1,
> 5,
> >> 0));
> >> >     if (validateResult.isError()) {
> >> >       string message = "Docker with mesos images requires docker
> 1.5+";
> >> >       message += validateResult.error();
> >> >       return Error(message);
> >> >     }
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> >   return new DockerContainerizer(flags, fetcher, docker);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > The question now is how can we create an isolator to work together
> >> > with the DockerContainerizer. Should we subclass the
> >> > DockerContainerizer and create a FlockerContainerizer instead? Any
> >> > other suggestions?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Frank and Phil
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Deshi Xiao
> > Twitter: xds2000
> > E-mail: xiaods(AT)gmail.com
>

Reply via email to