Hi Sarjeet,

I hope we fixed this in upcoming 0.27:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4304 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4304>

Bernd

> On Jan 25, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Sarjeet Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I ran into an issue when tried Mesos 0.26 version and started a marathon
> app using URI (with maprfs path) on a mesos cluster.
> 
> The issue seems to be caused by Mesos-3602 fix, and is causing issue for
> maprfs (mapr filesystem) when specified maprfs path as URI on marathon.
> 
> The issue is that, It is appending '/' to the URI maprfs path specified, in
> the beginning, and is not executed as expected. e.g.
> 
> =====
> *      hadoop fs -copyToLocal '/maprfs:///dist/hadoop-2.7.0.myriad1.tar.gz'
> '/opt/mapr/slaves/67d1f64c-449b-4609-82f3-5da309f3c5c5-S9/frameworks/67d1f64c-449b-4609-82f3-5da309f3c5c5-0000/executors/myriad1.63bbb98c-c072-11e5-b686-0cc47a587d20/runs/427fe309-82c5-4f8b-9fa3-6dd39a4a5ef4/hadoop-2.7.0.myriad1.tar.gz*
> 
> -copyToLocal: java.net.URISyntaxException: Expected scheme-specific part at
> index 7: maprfs:
> =====
> 
> The fix for Mesos-3602 only assumes hdfs path, and doesn't consider other
> cases, such as maprfs or other dfs paths. I haven't filed a JIRA yet on
> this issue, but would like to get some feedback on this, and expect this to
> be fixed for next Mesos release.
> 
> Let me know if there is anything else I could provide related to the issue.
> 
> -Sarjeet
> 
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> (Kapil, MPark and I) We're still having 3 blocker issues outstanding
>> at this moment:
>> 
>> MESOS-4449: SegFault on agent during executor startup (shepherd: Joris)
>> MESOS-4441: Do not allocate non-revocable resources beyond quota
>> guarantee. (shepherd: Joris)
>> MESOS-4410: Introduce protobuf for quota set request. (shepherd: Joris)
>> 
>> The remaining major tickets are ContainerLogger related and should be
>> committed today according to Ben.
>> 
>> We've started to test latest master and will be looking at the test
>> failures to see what needs to be addressed.
>> 
>> I encourage everyone to test the latest master on your platform if
>> possible to catch issues early, and once the Blocker issues are
>> resolved we'll be sending a RC to test and vote.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Tim
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to