I actually like the idea to have version specific documentation, since it is kind of the standard way of going about things.
+1 to that. > On 03 Feb 2016, at 01:53, Neil Conway <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree we should remove this text after some period of time has > passed since that version of Mesos was released; it is quite > distracting. > > The proper long-term fix is probably to have version-specific docs. So > all the documentation at > > /documentation/v0.27/... > > would implicitly discuss the features that are present in Mesos 0.27. > That would eliminate a lot of the need for version number references > in the documentation text itself. > > Neil > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Greg Mann <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all! >> In our docs, you find such sentences as: >> >> "Mesos 0.15.0 added support for framework authentication, and 0.19.0 added >> slave authentication." >> >> It's a minor point, but I wonder how long we should maintain such version >> numbers in the docs? In the example above, my feeling is that we are far >> enough past 0.19.0 that we could change this to read simply, "Mesos >> supports authentication of both frameworks and slaves". >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Greg
