No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday. Thanks, David
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show > the current votes during the ranking? > > Thanks, > Darren > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Jay, > > Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the > topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative > preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the > schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We > hope you enjoy the program we come up with :) > > Thanks, > David > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this >> MesosCon. >> >> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a >> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic: >> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a >> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the >> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an >> example. >> >> Cheers, >> /J >> >> ----- Original message ----- >> From: Kiersten Gaffney <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected], [email protected] >> Cc: David Greenberg <[email protected]>, Dave Lester < >> [email protected]>, Kiersten Gaffney <[email protected]> >> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25 >> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM >> >> >> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the >> community have submitted! >> >> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST >> >> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up >> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to >> last >> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for >> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should >> be included in the program. >> >> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve >> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users. >> >> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj >> >> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos. >> >> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp >> >> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and >> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc). >> >> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you >> didn't see proposed but would like to attend. >> >> Thanks in advance for your participation! >> >> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee) >> >>
