Thanks, Kapil. I've added you as reviewer.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Kapil Arya <[email protected]> wrote:

> Anurag, Yan,
>
> I can also help in reviewing this stuff. If Yan, has cycles to shepherd it,
> great, otherwise, I can shepherd it too.
>
> Best,
> Kapil
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Anurag Singh <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yan, would you like me to add you as the reviewer on the ReviewBoard
> > changes? I'm assuming that you will be the shepherd. Please let me know
> if
> > that isn't confirmed yet.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +Yan
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Anurag Singh <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Joseph's suggestion is that since Ben Hindman may not have enough
> time
> > to
> > > > shepherd this issue, we should seek another one. Would anyone here be
> > > able
> > > > to shepherd https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4610?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Anurag Singh <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As of now, we've got Ben Hindman as the designated shepherd. Joesph
> > Wu
> > > > has
> > > > > been helping us with the reviews and suggesting changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Vinod Kone <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> This is great to hear! @YanXu is this something you might be able
> to
> > > > >> shepherd?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Anurag Singh <
> > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We're inviting user and developer comments on a series of
> changes
> > we
> > > > >> have
> > > > >> > been working on that would modularize MasterContender and
> > > > >> MasterDetectors.
> > > > >> > The goal is to allow the use of detector and contender
> > > implementations
> > > > >> > other than the ones that are part of Mesos source (Standalone
> and
> > > > >> > Zookeeper). So if one would like to use a custom leader election
> > > > >> mechanism
> > > > >> > (e.g. one that relies on etcd, consul, etc.), it will be
> possible
> > to
> > > > >> load
> > > > >> > the implementation from a shared library. In practice, it
> > translates
> > > > to
> > > > >> > using the following command line options:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > For the mesos master:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --master_contender: The value of this command line option is the
> > > name
> > > > >> of a
> > > > >> > symbol (defined in a module and referenced in the value of the
> > > > --modules
> > > > >> > flag). The symbol refers to an object of type
> > > Module<MasterContender>.
> > > > >> For
> > > > >> > an example, please see the test_contender_module.cpp file in
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > For the mesos master and slave:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --master_detector:  The value of this command line option is the
> > > name
> > > > >> of a
> > > > >> > symbol (defined in a module and referenced in the value of the
> > > > --modules
> > > > >> > flag). The symbol refers to an object of type
> > > Module<MasterDetector>.
> > > > >> For
> > > > >> > an example, please see the test_detector_module.cpp file in
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The --modules option, in addition to pointing to the shared
> > library
> > > > and
> > > > >> > symbols, can be used to pass parameters (via the Parameters
> class)
> > > to
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > modules in the form of key-value pairs.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Also, please note that there is no change in the behavior of the
> > > > legacy
> > > > >> > --zk and --master options. They will continue to work as before.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The following changes implement this functionality and have been
> > > under
> > > > >> > review (thanks to Joseph Wu (Mesosphere) for his input):
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44287/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44288/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44543/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44544/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44545/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44546/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44547/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44289/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44669/
> > > > >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/44670/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to