What happened with these proposals? Do we know how / why they lost momentum?
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jojy Varghese <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kevin > Great initiative. Wanted to point out to earlier proposals on the topic: > > http://marc.info/?l=mesos-dev&m=144286256512205&w=2 > <http://marc.info/?l=mesos-dev&m=144286256512205&w=2> > > > -Jojy > > > >> On May 20, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Shivam Pathak <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Great! please add me to the group >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:07 AM, haosdent <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This sounds great, add me to the group please. >>> >>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Kevin Klues <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'd like to propose starting a dedicated "review process" working >>>> group. The goals of this working group will be to: >>>> >>>> 1) Discuss issues around the current review process >>>> 2) Propose improvements to the current review process >>>> 3) Implement / Monitor / Enforce the new process we come up with going >>>> forward >>>> >>>> Anyone who'd like to be involved, please respond to this thread so I >>>> can add you to the working group. We will likely start actively >>>> discussing things after MesosCon. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ~Kevin >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Haosdent Huang >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Shivam Pathak (Mr)* >> Software Engineer and Systems Architect >> Novatap Private Ltd. >> HP: +65 8543 2297 > -- ~Kevin
