I should have added that it will be inconvenient for us but not impossible to cope. However I am not convinced about the need to rename so let's chat about this on the review or the dev list.
--- Jiang Yan Xu <y...@jxu.me> | @xujyan <https://twitter.com/xujyan> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Yan Xu <y...@jxu.me> wrote: > I made a comment on https://reviews.apache.org/r/59453/ > > --- > Jiang Yan Xu <y...@jxu.me> | @xujyan <https://twitter.com/xujyan> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Vinod Kone <vi...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > >> If it hasn't been released it should be ok for us to do the rename. There >> are no backwards compatible guarantees for such things. But a heads up is >> always nice, so thanks for doing that. >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Neil Conway <neil.con...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> FYI, I merged the change to rename this field into the master and >>> 1.3.x branches; it will be included in the next 1.3.0 release >>> candidate. >>> >>> Neil >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Alexander Rojas >>> <alexan...@mesosphere.io> wrote: >>> > Hey guys, >>> > >>> > We just noted that there was an error when the `RegisterAgent` act was >>> > introduced. Namely, its object field is listed as `agent` when by >>> convention >>> > we have used plural, so it should be `agents`. This ACL hasn’t been >>> part of >>> > any released version of Mesos, so if no one is using it I will try to >>> push >>> > for a rename without going through any deprecation cycle. >>> > >>> > The big question is if any of you are using this particular ACL in >>> > production right now? >>> > >>> > Alexander Rojas >>> > alexan...@mesosphere.io >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >
