Looks like an important patch (https://reviews.apache.org/r/62053/) is missing from this RC and so we're canceling the vote. We will publish another RC shortly.
Sorry for the inconvenience. Best, Anand and Kapil On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Kapil Arya <ka...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos 1.4.0. > > 1.4.0 includes the following: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Ability to recover the agent ID after a host reboot. > * File-based and image-pull secrets. > * Linux ambient and bounding capabilities support. > * Ability to efficiently measure disk usage without enforcing usage > constraints. > * Hierarchical resource allocation roles. [EXPERIMENTAL] > > The CHANGELOG for the release is available at: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=blob_ > plain;f=CHANGELOG;hb=1.4.0-rc4 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > The candidate for Mesos 1.4.0 release is available at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/1.4.0-rc4/mesos-1.4.0.tar.gz > > The tag to be voted on is 1.4.0-rc4: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=commit;h=1.4.0-rc4 > > The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/1.4.0-rc4/ > mesos-1.4.0.tar.gz.md5 > > The signature of the tarball can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mesos/1.4.0-rc4/ > mesos-1.4.0.tar.gz.asc > > The PGP key used to sign the release is here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/mesos/KEYS > > The JAR is up in Maven in a staging repository here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemesos-1214 > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Mesos 1.4.0! > > The vote is open until Mon Sep 11 11:59:00 PM EDT 2017 and passes if a > majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Mesos 1.4.0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thanks, > Anand and Kapil >