Hello:
After discussing with folks, we want to propose to use `string` in the
`Quantity` message and also leave out the name at the moment:
message Quantity {
required string value = 1;
}
A sample use case for setting resource guarantee will be:
message ResourceGuaranteeRequest {
optional string role = 1;
optional map<string, Quantity> resource_quantities = 2;
}
I have updated the design doc here
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbRKmqsos1-IBJ9VjpT4kNIp2Peyvx2k4UphRaFVYFU/edit#>
with more context, alternative proposals, and examples. Feel free leave
comments and questions. Thanks!
-Meng
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:20 PM Meng Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> We are proposing to add a primitive type `Quantity` to facilitate several
> ongoing projects. The schema will be:
>
> message Quantity {
> required string name;
> optional value.scalar scalar;
> }
>
> You can find more details such as motivation, current, and future use
> cases in this design doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WbRKmqsos1-IBJ9VjpT4kNIp2Peyvx2k4UphRaFVYFU/edit?usp=sharing>.
> Feel free leave comments and questions.
>
> Thanks,
> Meng
>
