Yes. Definitely..

Best Regards,
Hosur Narahari

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Alberto Rodriguez <ardl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good job! Go ahead with the release.
>
> 2015-04-09 12:58 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > OK the METAMODEL-131 was now added to master as welll... So release time
> ?
> >
> > 2015-04-06 19:22 GMT+02:00 hosur narahari <hnr1...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have committed the fix. Please review
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Hosur Narahari
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Kasper Sørensen <
> > > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Absolutely. Let's keep the door open for a fix. In my opinion this
> > would
> > > be
> > > > a nice addition to the release but also not something I would want to
> > > block
> > > > the release for if it isn't done in 2-3 days or so?
> > > >
> > > > 2015-04-06 18:13 GMT+02:00 hosur narahari <hnr1...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey,
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought of giving fix to METAMODEL-131 today. Is it Okay?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > Hosur Narahari
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Kasper Sørensen <
> > > > > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was looking at the recent changes and I start to feel it would
> be
> > > > nice
> > > > > > with another point release given all the nice improvements made
> > > > (version
> > > > > > 4.3.3 I imagine). I do also know that for our use of MetaModel
> > > > especially
> > > > > > the elasticsearch 1.4.x compatibility change is pretty important.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think? Anyone working on something they would really
> > like
> > > > to
> > > > > > have included first? If not I propose to start the release
> process
> > > in a
> > > > > few
> > > > > > days or so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Btw. Happy easter to all who celebrate it :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Kasper
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to