Glad to see the interested faces :) Maybe you can check out the code and try it out. Would love some feedback and maybe with that we can think of including it (or something like it) in a new module under MetaModel itself.
2015-08-24 17:21 GMT+02:00 hosur narahari <hnr1...@gmail.com>: > That indeed sounds very interesting Kasper. Let me know how I can help :) > > Best Regards, > Hosur Narahari > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Alberto Rodriguez <ardl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > That sounds very interesting Kasper. > > > > Looking forward to attending your talk ;) > > > > 2015-08-23 22:36 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen < > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > Although this didn't seem to catch the immediate attention of anyone, I > > > anyways need a good example use-case for my Apache: Big Data talk so I > > made > > > a prototype of a system like this. If anyone's interested the code can > be > > > found on my github account [1] and later on I might suggest it for > > > inclusion in MetaModel if people seem to like it :) > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/kaspersorensen/ApacheBigDataMetaModelExample > > > > > > 2015-07-01 8:36 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen < > > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > In Human Inference we have an idea/requirement to make it possible to > > > > remotely explore metadata and fire queries towards a DataContext that > > is > > > > bound to a specific server machine. The idea is that it should be > > > possible > > > > for clients to also access this DataContext, but obviously since the > > > > context is bound to the server, it would have to be via some web > > service > > > or > > > > other remoting technology. While I was sketching out what was needed > to > > > do > > > > this I kinda realized that this could actually be something we make > > > > available as a general MetaModel module instead that we build a > one-off > > > for > > > > our specific application. > > > > > > > > So first question I guess is: Do you think such a feature would be a > > good > > > > addition to MetaModel? > > > > > > > > Onto the design of it ... I imagine that in the MetaModel perspective > > we > > > > could make abstract servlets, controllers or something like that, > which > > > the > > > > application developers could then quite easily adapt and expose the > > > > DataContext that they wish from. I would personally prefer if they > are > > > > REST based. So we could even consider if we can make something JAX-RS > > > based > > > > or something like that. > > > > > > > > I imagine that for read-only access there would be at least two web > > > > services: 1) a schema web service and 2) a query web service. On the > > > server > > > > side this would expose data for the client to implement the > > getSchemas() > > > > and executeQuery(...) methods on a client-side DataContext > > > implementation. > > > > > > > > Of course there are always security concerns with something like this > > > too. > > > > My feeling is that if we make it in deed abstract then the > application > > > > designers can judge what should be possible security-wise and so on. > > > > > > > > Please let me know what you think. I can be more specific if needed, > > but > > > I > > > > thought to first just present the general idea. In my opinion this > > could > > > be > > > > a pretty cool way to broaden the scope of MetaModel and open up for > > more > > > > data federation type use cases. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Kasper > > > > > > > > > >
