GitHub user kaspersorensen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/59
METAMODEL-198: Implemented timestamp literal based on JDBC spec
Inspired by #58 I decided to make this PR to show what I had in mind as an
alternative patch which aligns closer to the JDBC spec instead of taking the
literalization of timestamps into MetaModel's codebase.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kaspersorensen/metamodel
METAMODEL-198/timestamp-jdbc
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/59.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #59
----
commit f70eb7f54c0a715314b4315beca99819209857c2
Author: Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]>
Date: 2015-10-18T17:14:12Z
METAMODEL-198: Implemented timestamp literal based on JDBC spec
----
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
