[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14962912#comment-14962912
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on METAMODEL-198:
------------------------------------------
Github user LosD commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/59#issuecomment-149116429
'To be precise it "only" has precision of a 1000th of a millisecond.'
'Apparently the microsecond precision that they claim to have is only in
the storage layer.'
One thousandth of a millisecond is a microsecond... Doesn't that make the
microsecond precision claim correct? Or did you mean nanosecond precision?
> Where clauses on timestamp loses the nanoseconds
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: METAMODEL-198
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-198
> Project: Apache MetaModel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ankit Kumar
>
> Queries having where clause on timestamp column in databases loses the
> nanoseconds.
> This is happening because the Timestamp values are converted to Date object
> using the new Date(long timeInMilliseconds).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
