Thank you for your answer Kasper. I completely agree! 2016-06-07 17:21 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]>:
> I think that as long as the driver is backwards compatible then we are > in a good place to just keep with the latest'n'greatest only. > > 2016-06-07 3:30 GMT-07:00 Alberto Rodriguez <[email protected]>: > > Hi all, > > > > I've just opened an issue in jira to bump the cassandra driver version to > > the latest one: METAMODEL-1094 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-1094> I was wondering > > whether we need to create separate modules for Cassandra 2 and Cassandra > 3 > > as we did for MongoDB. The latest version of the driver (as of today > 3.0.2) > > is backward-compatible with the previous versions of Cassandra: > > > > *"The Java client driver 3.0 (branch 3.0 > > <https://github.com/datastax/java-driver/tree/3.0>) is compatible with > > Apache Cassandra 1.2, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 and 3.0 (see this page > > <http://datastax.github.io/java-driver/manual/native_protocol> for the > most > > up-to-date compatibility information)."* >
