Thanks!

Le 21 août 2017 10:24 PM, "Sebastian Samaruga" <ssama...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I've been discussing this issues: the transition from a 'document
> oriented' web into a 'data and services oriented web' for a while in the
> semantic-web related w3c mailing lists. In short it seems we had have to
> deal with building 'applications' over *documents* for a long time and it
> seems it does not need to be the the same within a data oriented web (at
> least for me).
>
> However, applications does not build by themselves. XML and others
> promised interoperability since a long time before RDF and, although I
> belive RDF / SW could, there will be no interoperability (as that of
> RESTFul services) until there is no agreement in 'semiotic' semantics of
> representations, resources and protocols.
>
> The document I'm attaching here is an extended version of yesterday's
> abstract but it only states a few concepts regarding integration (alignment
> and merge of datasources. I'm not a seasoned SW nor integration developer).
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OqsVn6uo0cr6qruzWj9yRASrmvAIA
> f4HsHuLS2aRSy8/edit?usp=drivesdk
>
> Best Regards,
> Sebastián.
> On Aug 21, 2017 12:36 PM, "Michel Kern" <echoprax...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Sebastian
>>
>> I share your concerns, even though (or precisely because) I'm not a
>> 'referent' in Application and Data storage interoperability, I'm a seasoned
>> SW engineer (1). My feedback on your article, is that the use case
>> illustrates  the challenges and needs for a web of interoperables solutions
>> (maybe you could mention SKOS among the Semweb languages)
>>
>>
>> My interest for interoperability started in 1997, at this time there was
>> CORBA and Microsoft COM, then regarding RDBMS, there was ODBC/JDBC. There
>> was also all the vendors buzz like SAP pretending to teach esperanto to the
>> babel towers of legacy apps (but in fact replacing backoffice apps by
>> theirs)
>>
>>
>> Some time XML and its modelling 'applications' (XML Schema and XMI) gave
>> me some hopes, but still no concrete sign of 'user driven apps' built by a
>> dynamic process of looking for and assembling 'autodescribed components'
>> (SOAP and WSDL was then a kind of CORBA successor)
>>
>>
>> Before the Semantic Web,
>> I had never really 'bought' the idea that SQL based Data Storage was
>> considered as a 'Silver Bullet', ORM solutions seemed to bring even more
>> entropy.
>>
>>
>> But with the advent of Graph Databases (e.g. Neo4J) and this brilliant
>> solution (Apache MetaModel) for Data Storage interoperability, I am at last
>> more comfortable and comfortable with the idea that the solutions are
>> available for designing interoperable solutions in an elegant way at last.
>>
>>
>>     I am most fluent in the DataViz and ETL dimensions of Semantic
>> networks. I authored a mindmapping app in 2004: Thinkgraph, now I'm
>> prototyping a solution to provide interoperability between 'knowledge
>> visualization' (e.g. TheBrain, XMind), Data Storage and Curating platforms
>> (e.g. Pinterest, Evernote, Youtube, etc..).
>> I chose .Net/C# as my development workshop thats why I started a port of
>> Apache MetaModel in C#.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>>     Michel Kern
>>
>> 1. Dassault Systèmes 1991-2000, Nokia 2001-2010
>>
>>

Reply via email to