On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi MetaModel community, > > Per email from Matt, I'd like to formally start discussion about Review > Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review (CTR). > > I actually like to use review then commit (RTC) for big changes tat > requires changes to major code flow and behavior. > For small bug fixes we probably dont need code review or use common sense > when needed. > In general, I agree. The only thing I would change is that it depends on where we are at in the development cycle. If we are nearing release, RTC makes a ton of sense for any large change, but early in development it can be a big barrier to moving quickly. Thoughts? > > All comments and suggestions are welcomed. > > Thanks, > > Henry > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Matt Franklin <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > This also brings up the question as to what type of community MetaModel > > is/wants to be. Are we Review Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review > > (CTR)? There are positives and negatives to both approaches, but most > > communities I have seen are CTR. > > > > >
