2013/8/4 Matt Franklin <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Kasper Sørensen <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Good point about Jackcess Dave. Actually I had in my mind that it was
>> MIT licensed, but it seems you're right! So we gotta figure something
>> out. Is it even allowed for Apache projects to release with such a
>> dependency, I think not?
>>
>
> Correct.  We cannot produce any kind of release that includes GPL code or
> binaries.
>
>
>>
>> An option could be to NOT include the MetaModel-Access module in the
>> Apache codebase at all. Instead let us at Human Inference release it
>> as a third party module. We already do this with the SAS module [1]
>> and will start doing it with the dBase module [2] , for the same
>> reason. This is obviously not an attempt from our side to exclude
>> these modules from the apache space, but just because we don't control
>> that licensed code and we would like to retain (in some form) the wide
>> connectivity of MetaModel, also after moving to Apache.
>>
>
> It is an acceptable work around though it would be better if we could
> refactor to a non-GPL dependency that accomplishes the same function.
>

Agreed, but for Access connectivity I don't think there really is such
a thing. Of course there is the good ol' Sun ODBC-JDBC driver that
makes "some kind of" connectivity possible, but my impression is that
metadata support is horrible and we can't really make it work without.

>
>>
>> [1] Also LGPL; SassyReader - http://sassyreader.eobjects.org
>> [2] Also LGPL; Recently made a fork of that module from the old
>> MetaModel project, but compatible with the new Apache namespace at
>> http://eobjects.org/svn/DeeBaseReader/trunk/ (does not have a website
>> or something like that yet).
>>
>> 2013/8/4 Dave Fisher <[email protected]>:
>> > There should be some discussion about IP clearance in advance of a first
>> release.
>> >
>> > Has the podling discussed how to properly handle GPL dependencies like
>> Jackcess? These will need to be optional in an Apache Release.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > On Aug 4, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
>> >
>> >> Any volunteer to prepare report this month?
>> >>
>> >> Arvind's recommendation is great but we will try baby steps to prepare
>> the
>> >> complete report.
>> >>
>> >> We just need to say that all  INFRA work is done and we are start
>> ramping
>> >> up on development.
>> >> Also website and wiki is up and running so people can start visiting to
>> get
>> >> more info.
>> >>
>> >> - Henry
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Marvin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear podling,
>> >>>
>> >>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>> >>> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
>> >>> quarterly
>> >>> board report.
>> >>>
>> >>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 August 2013, 10:30:00:00
>> PST.
>> >>> The report
>> >>> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
>> >>> Incubator PMC
>> >>> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting,
>> to
>> >>> allow
>> >>> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Aug 7th).
>> >>>
>> >>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
>> PMC,
>> >>> and
>> >>> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very
>> latest you
>> >>> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>>
>> >>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>> >>>
>> >>> Submitting your Report
>> >>> ----------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> Your report should contain the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> * Your project name
>> >>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>> the
>> >>> project
>> >>>   or necessarily of its field
>> >>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>> towards
>> >>>   graduation.
>> >>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>> >>> aware of
>> >>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>> >>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>> >>>
>> >>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>> >>>
>> >>>  http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2013
>> >>>
>> >>> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>> this
>> >>> page is
>> >>>      created from a template.
>> >>>
>> >>> Mentors
>> >>> -------
>> >>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
>> on the
>> >>> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following
>> the
>> >>> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the
>> Incubator
>> >>> PMC.
>> >>>
>> >>> Incubator PMC
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>

Reply via email to