I believe you will need to file an INFRA request. Regards, Arvind
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>wrote: > Anyone know if I could add someone as moderator or do I need to file INFRA > ticket? > > - Henry > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Kasper Sørensen < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Seems I am not in the moderator list. Can someone populate the metrics > > for me? (Or add me as moderator if that's appropriate). > > > > 2013/8/5 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Henry Saputra <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks for the resources Arvind. We should probably add this to Wiki > to > > >> help the preparer for next report. > > >> > > >> - Henry > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > >> > > >>> The draft looks good! Regarding the metrics, here is how I collect > them > > >>> for > > >>> the projects I report on: > > >>> > > >>> 1. Number of subscriber for a particular list eg dev: send email to > > >>> [email protected]. Note that in order for this > > list > > >>> command to work, you should be a moderator of the list. > > >>> > > >>> 2. For number of messages exchanged on a particular list eg dev - I > > look > > >>> at > > >>> the archive count from the mail-archives [1]. If you look at it right > > now, > > >>> you will see that there were 94 messages in the month of July. > > Reporting > > >>> by > > >>> month is easier than by exact report period as it will otherwise > > require > > >>> you to count messages etc. > > >>> > > >>> 3. For number of JIRA issues resolved, you can run a query in ASF > JIRA > > >>> with > > >>> specific dates. The one that I usually run is something like > "project = > > >>> METAMODEL AND resolution = fixed AND resolutionDate > 2013-7-19". > Note > > >>> that > > >>> you can change the date to the last report cut-off period in the > > future. > > >>> See [2] for an example of this query run. > > >>> > > >>> [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-metamodel-dev/ > > >>> [2] http://s.apache.org/9dj > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Arvind Prabhakar > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Kasper Sørensen < > > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Please find my initial draft/proposal for the PMC/BOard report of > > >>> > August 2013. Comments more than welcome. > > >>> > > > >>> > Note/question: Arvind indicated that some metrics of subscribers, > > >>> > messages and JIRA activity would be good to include. Can we get > these > > >>> > numbers from somewhere easily, or do I have to do a manual count? > > >>> > > > >>> > Here's the report so far: > > >>> > > > >>> > ------------ > > >>> > > > >>> > MetaModel > > >>> > > > >>> > MetaModel is a data access framework, providing a common interface > > for > > >>> > exploration and querying of different types of datastores. > > >>> > > > >>> > MetaModel has been incubating since 2013-06-12. > > >>> > > > >>> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards > > graduation: > > >>> > > > >>> > 1. Roadmapping of our first Apache MetaModel release. Since the > > >>> > namespace change is going to break backwards compatibility of the > > >>> > project anyway, a couple of "old but breaking ideas" needs to be > > >>> > accepted or rejected. > > >>> > 2. Bring more diverse committers and contributors to the project. > > >>> > 3. We will probably be having several third party modules for > > >>> > MetaModel, because of (L)GPL dependencies. We want to figure out a > > >>> > good way to make this understandable for users (through website or > > >>> > similar means). > > >>> > > > >>> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to > be > > >>> > aware of? > > >>> > > > >>> > No > > >>> > > > >>> > How has the community developed since the last report? > > >>> > > > >>> > The pending INFRA work was finished in end-july, and we are > > starting > > >>> > to take it into use. > > >>> > > > >>> > We've decided to go for a Review-Then-Commit policy. We will > allow > > >>> > lazy concensus after 3 days and a minimum of one +1 vote. > > >>> > > > >>> > There are currently no concrete plans for a release. We have some > > >>> > discussions and proposals of features on the mailing list which we > > >>> > want to settle on first. > > >>> > > > >>> > Since incubation we have not made any new appointments for either > > >>> > committer or PMC member. > > >>> > > > >>> > How has the project developed since the last report? > > >>> > > > >>> > The code has been moved from eobjects.org to Apache's Git server > > >>> > (https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-metamodel.git). > 5 > > >>> > bugfixes from the base release 3.4.4 was applied to our codebase as > > >>> > well. > > >>> > > > >>> > The namespace of the project has been changed to > > >>> > org.apache.metamodel (previously org.eobjects.metamodel). To aid > > >>> > migration, we've also implemented a helping facility for > > deserializing > > >>> > objects of the old namespace into the new. > > >>> > > > >>> > A performance optimization for the CSV module has been proposed > and > > >>> > applied. > > >>> > > > >>> > The project now has a website > > >>> > (http://metamodel.incubator.apache.org/). The website is meant > > mostly > > >>> > as an 'appetizer', and we're planning to put lengthier pieces of > > >>> > information onto our wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/metamodel/), and > > if > > >>> > needed link to those from the website. Some initial content has > been > > >>> > put on the wiki as well. > > >>> > > > >>> > The project contains a Microsoft Access module, which depends on > > the > > >>> > LGPL licensed Jackcess library. We are looking for a replacement > > >>> > dependency or to remove the module from the project. > > >>> > > > >>> > Date of last release: > > >>> > > > >>> > None > > >>> > > > >>> > Signed-off-by: > > >>> > > > >>> > [ ](metamodel) Henry Saputra > > >>> > [ ](metamodel) Arvind Prabhakar > > >>> > [ ](metamodel) Matt Franklin > > >>> > [ ](metamodel) Noah Slater > > >>> > > > >>> > Shepherd notes: > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >
