+1 :-) I agree to those rules that you just sketched there (RTC / min 1 vote / 48 hours lazy commit).
2013/9/5 Henry Saputra <[email protected]> > I guess it is the good time to discuss about the MetaModel bylaws =) > > Here is the link to how ASF Voting process: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > As indicated by the link [1], unless a vote is declared as lazy > consensus dictate three +1 votes are required for a code-modification > proposal to pass. > > And it is usually added to the JIRA to track down the vote process. > > We will need to create bylaws page in wiki or website to help new > developers understand how we operate. > > If it is agreed upon, we could use review-then-commits with at least 1 > vote to commit and if no response in 48 hours we could invoke lazy > consensus to get the patch going > > - Henry > > [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Kasper Sørensen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to clarify something now since we have seen a few times that > > people submit patches directly to JIRA. Which is fine :-) > > > > But how should we do voting on the patches then? Will we treat JIRA > > comments just like any other mail reply, and simply post our "+1"s on the > > JIRA issue itself? I also see JIRA has a voting mechanism although I > > haven't tried it. Finally we could also opt for re-raising the patch in > the > > mailing list and only do the votes by mail. > > > > What do you think is best, and what's common practice for Apache > projects? > > > > Kasper > > > > PS: Either way is fine by me :-) >
