+1
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>wrote: > I am +1 with CTR especially with smaller community like MetaModel > > - Henry > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Kasper Sørensen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > For some time we've had this DRAFT bylaws document on the wiki: > > https://wiki.apache.org/metamodel/Bylaws > > > > As Noah pointed out in another thread [1], the current bylaws wiki page > > raises a few concerns. And the question of Commit-The-Review (CTR) or > > Review-Then-Commit (RTC) is once again opened. > > > > I call for a discussion on what people's preferences are in terms of the > > things we want to have in our bylaws. The current wiki page is a very > close > > adaptation of the Kafka project's bylaws, and maybe that was a wrong > move, > > seeing that it didn't leave much room for us to come up with something > from > > our own standpoints. > > > > My personal feelings on bylaws: I am thinking maybe we can cut down on > the > > number of things we want to regulate, to make our own life easier. I > think > > committers could be granted the right to follow a CTR process. > > Contributions from newcomers should obviously by reviewed by submitting > > patch files or pull requests and having a voting/approval procedure. Lazy > > concensus in such situations would maybe require more than 1 vote (2 or > 3), > > since it's coming from a newcomer. > > > > Hope to get a lot of valuable feedback on this. And if anyone wants to > take > > the lead on the bylaws I would be grateful, since I am myself a bit of a > > newcomer in this area! > > > > Kasper > > > > [1] Called "How to vote on a patch in JIRA". >
