I see the same thing ... If I download https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zipand run "mvn rat:check" it fails.
Looking at the report it seems that the configuration of the rat plugin is not picked up correctly. In our configuration we have a bunch of <exclude> elements but the rat plugin fails while processing those exact files that should have been excluded (for instance src/site/*, target/* files and more). 2013/12/12 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]> > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for your quick feedback. > > I would like to share that the Rat check is done as part of the mvn > release process. It is automatically called because the Apache parent pom > has the check applied under a release profile. No one can influence it. > > Attach I send you all the summarized rat report file for all modules as > was generated when I released the code on 2013-12-03. > NOTE: Since for each module it generates separate rat.txt files, so I have > copy pasted the output in one file. > > Also in the first release vote thread we got feedback from Arvind but it > was mainly for a DISCLAIMER file which we fixed. > > Are there different ways to trigger the same test as in the build it does > not fail and on your end it fails. > > Please enlighten us. > > Regards > Ankit > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Matt Franklin > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> -0 >> >> The build failed a rat:check which means we probably didn't run it as >> part of the release process. I have attached the report. It looks like >> mostly test and supplemental files, but we need to make sure all released >> source has proper headers. The biggest issues are the test sources that >> are missing headers. We need to not exclude tests in the rat check and >> make sure any files that represent more than trivial content have headers. >> Otherwise, they should be ignored in the rat config. >> >> In the LICENSE file, licenses are included for transitive dependencies >> that are not part of the source package. These should not be there. Only >> licenses for included source should be added. (I see in the rat report >> ahttp://css3pie.com). >> >> IMO, these are not critical blockers but please create issues in JIRA >> that MUST be resolved before next release and be prepared to defend the >> rat:check issue to the wider incubator and I will change my vote. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> After some discussions and agreements here I send again the VOTE >>> thread, additionally added the location of the sources as in the >>> staging repository. >>> >>> >>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0. >>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache. >>> >>> The tag to be voted on is >>> v4.0.0-incubating: >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating >>> >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following >>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc >>> >>> The staging repository for this release can be found >>> at: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/ >>> >>> Source jars can be found here: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/ >>> >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel >>> 4.0.0-incubating. >>> >>> The vote is open until <17th December 2013 00:00 CET> and passes if a >>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast. >>> >>> Regards >>> Ankit >>> >> >> >
