I see the same thing ... If I download
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating-source-release.zipand
run "mvn rat:check" it fails.

Looking at the report it seems that the configuration of the rat plugin is
not picked up correctly. In our configuration we have a bunch of <exclude>
elements but the rat plugin fails while processing those exact files that
should have been excluded (for instance src/site/*, target/* files and
more).


2013/12/12 Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>

> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks for your quick feedback.
>
> I would like to share that the Rat check is done as part of the mvn
> release process. It is automatically called because the Apache parent pom
> has the check applied under a release profile. No one can influence it.
>
> Attach I send you all the summarized rat report file for all modules as
> was generated when I released the code on 2013-12-03.
> NOTE: Since for each module it generates separate rat.txt files, so I have
> copy pasted the output in one file.
>
> Also in the first release vote thread we got feedback from Arvind but it
> was mainly for a DISCLAIMER file which we fixed.
>
> Are there different ways to trigger the same test as in the build it does
> not fail and on your end it fails.
>
> Please enlighten us.
>
> Regards
> Ankit
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Matt Franklin 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> -0
>>
>> The build failed a rat:check which means we probably didn't run it as
>> part of the release process.  I have attached the report.  It looks like
>> mostly test and supplemental files, but we need to make sure all released
>> source has proper headers.  The biggest issues are the test sources that
>> are missing headers.  We need to not exclude tests in the rat check and
>> make sure any files that represent more than trivial content have headers.
>>  Otherwise, they should be ignored in the rat config.
>>
>> In the LICENSE file, licenses are included for transitive dependencies
>> that are not part of the source package.  These should not be there.  Only
>> licenses for included source should be added.  (I see in the rat report
>> ahttp://css3pie.com).
>>
>> IMO, these are not critical blockers but please create issues in JIRA
>> that MUST be resolved before next release and be prepared to defend the
>> rat:check issue to the wider incubator and I will change my vote.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> After some discussions and agreements here I send again the VOTE
>>> thread, additionally added the location of the sources as in the
>>> staging repository.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>>> MetaModel(incubating) version 4.0.0.
>>> This will be the first incubator release for Metamodel in Apache.
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>> v4.0.0-incubating:
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-metamodel.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/MetaModel-4.0.0-incubating
>>>
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following
>>> key:https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ankitkumar2711.asc
>>>
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found
>>> at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/
>>>
>>> Source jars can be found here:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemetamodel-010/org/apache/metamodel/MetaModel/4.0.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache MetaModel
>>> 4.0.0-incubating.
>>>
>>> The vote is open until <17th December 2013 00:00 CET> and passes if a
>>> majority of at least 3 IPMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ankit
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to