I think we should do 4.1.0 then if anyone ask for 4.0.x we could generate release as needed.
Thoughts? - Henry On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Kasper Sørensen <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes we do also have the 4.0.x branch for that. Actually this issue: > > [METAMODEL-32] - Fixed thread-safety issue in Excel module when tables > (sheets) metadata is updated. > > Could/should be applied on the 4.0.x branch I guess ... It's a > non-intrusive but (in concurrent situations) quite critical fix for the > excel module. > > > 2014-03-17 18:58 GMT+01:00 Henry Saputra <[email protected]>: > >> We could go with 4.1.0. >> >> My 2-cents is that we could reserve something like 4.0.x for emergency >> patches like security. >> >> >> - Henry >> >> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Kasper Sørensen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I feel like we should start planning MetaModel 4.1. In the current master >> > branch we have a number of nice improvements that I'm really excited >> about >> > and would like to see released. The main points from changes.txt: >> > >> > [METAMODEL-11] - New module "MetaModel-spring" which adds a convenient >> > FactoryBean to produce various types of DataContext objects based on >> > externalizable parameters, for Spring framework users. >> > [METAMODEL-41] - Added a parser for SimpleTableDef objects >> > (SimpleTableDefParser). It parses statements similar to CREATE TABLE >> > statements, although without the "CREATE TABLE" prefix. For example: foo >> > (bar INTEGER, baz VARCHAR) >> > [METAMODEL-32] - Fixed thread-safety issue in Excel module when tables >> > (sheets) metadata is updated. >> > [METAMODEL-35] - Improved query rewriting for DB2 when paged queries >> > contain ORDER BY clause. >> > [METAMODEL-39] - Added pooling of active/used Connections and >> > PreparedStatements in JDBC compiled queries. >> > >> > I think also the HBase module (in a branch) is looking rather OK for a >> > first release. Maybe we can aim to finish up this module and include it. >> In >> > that case I am all for releasing MetaModel again with a version number >> like >> > 4.1. >> > >> > Of course we could also go for just a minor release bump like 4.0.1, but >> I >> > think actually the addition of Spring module and potentially also HBase >> > module is great news. >> > >> > What do you guys think? >> > >> > - Kasper >>
