+1 to moving away from the wiki. I really don't like it. On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Justin Leet <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm mostly +1 for moving away from the wiki, and keeping things lined up > with source. I do think it has a place though as a spot to put some Apache > type stuff, and maybe link recordings of talks or meetups and such. > > On Jun 13, 2017 4:15 PM, "Nick Allen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for migrating away from the Wiki. I am not a fan. It is too difficult > to keep in-sync with the source code. It also doesn't get the loving care > and review that a PR does in our community. > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:27 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I suggested in the past and got some buy in, but never had time to move > > everything into GitHub. I vote to mostly or entirely archive the wiki. > > > > Jon > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017, 5:19 PM Laurens Vets <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 2017-06-13 14:09, Otto Fowler wrote: > > > > I think there are things in the wiki that are very very out of date, > to > > > > the > > > > extent that they are confusing people looking at Metron. > > > > Basically anyone going to DOCS HOME from the site is being thrown > into > > > > documentation that is sure to confuse them. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any ideas how we can address this? Can we prune > the > > > > wiki > > > > and remove the out of date information ( better less than wrong )? > > > > Should > > > > we replace DOCS HOME with the site book link? > > > > > > Throw out the old/wrong stuff asap. > > > > > > I also wouldn't mind trying to get some structure in it but is the wiki > > > still necessary if everything will be in markdown in the source > > > eventually? > > > > > -- > > > > Jon > > >
