GitHub user merrimanr opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/702

    METRON-1114: Add group by capabilities to search REST endpoint

    ## Contributor Comments
    This PR adds a group by feature to the search REST endpoint.  This PR is 
fairly complex so I don't think it should be merged before a thorough 
discussion and review.
    
    The following is an intentionally simple example of how group by works.  
Normally a search query would be issued and the results returned would be 
similar to:
    ```
    {
      "total": 100,
      "results": [
        { ... },
        { ... },
        and so on
      ]
    }
    ```
    
    This PR allows a user to group results based on a field or list of fields.  
For example, grouping results by a field called "fieldA" would be done by 
including a "groupByFields" property:
    ```
    {
      "groupByFields":["fieldA"],
      "from": 0,
      "query": "*",
      ...
    }
    ```
    The results would then change to this form:
    ```
    {
      "total": 100,
      "groupedBy": "fieldA",
      "groups": [
        {
          "key": "value1",
          "results": [
            { ... },
            { ... },
            and so on
          ]
      ]
    }
    ```
    Grouping by multiple fields would just be a matter of adding a field to the 
"groupByFields" list:
    ```
    {
      "groupByFields":["fieldA", "fieldB"],
      "from": 0,
      "query": "*",
      ...
    }
    ```
    The groups would then be nested based on the order they appear in the list:
    ```
    {
      "total": 100,
      "groupedBy": "fieldA",
      "groups": [
        {
          "key": "fieldA value1",
          "groupedBy": "fieldB",
          "groups": [
            {
              "key": "fieldB value1",
              "results": [
                { ... },
                { ... },
                and so on
              ]
            },
            {
             "key": "fieldB value2",
             "results": [
                { ... },
                { ... },
                and so on
              ]
            }
          ]
        } 
      ]
    }
    ```
    This has been verified and tested in full dev.  For example, this search 
query:
    ```
    {
      "groupByFields":["ip_src_addr","ip_dst_port"],
      "from": 0,
      "indices": [
        "bro"
      ],
      "query": "*",
      "size": 5
    }
    ```
    should return search results properly grouped by those fields.  The "size" 
and "sort" parameters also apply to groups of search results, however the 
"from" parameter does not because it doesn't make sense for that type of query 
(and ES doesn't support it from what I can tell).
    
    There are a couple of outstanding issues that we need to work through 
before this gets merged:  
    
    - The group by feature is included as part of the general search feature 
but having worked through the implementation, I'm not sure this is still the 
best approach.  There is non-trivial conditional logic that I think makes this 
class harder to understand and it might make sense to move this group by query 
to a separate endpoint.  Interested to hear others' perspective on this since I 
am so close to it.  
    
    - I also did a fair amount of refactoring in an attempt to make this class 
easier to read.  If that is not the case and the refactoring made it worse, let 
me know.  
    
    - And finally (it has been requested in the past), I think we definitely 
need more detailed documentation around this particular endpoint.  I am 
planning on adding some extensive documentation to this PR once we settle on an 
API design approach.  The alerts UI isn't quite ready for this feature so 
there's no rush in getting this merged.
    
    ## Pull Request Checklist
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
    Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
    Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  
    
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
 
    - [x] Does your PR title start with METRON-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
    - [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
      ```
      mvn -q clean integration-test install && build_utils/verify_licenses.sh 
      ```
    
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to 
verify your changes?
    - [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [x] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building 
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run 
the following commands and the verify changes via 
`site-book/target/site/index.html`:
    
      ```
      cd site-book
      mvn site
      ```
    
    #### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
    It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up 
for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before 
submitting a pull request.
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/merrimanr/incubator-metron METRON-1114

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/702.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #702
    
----
commit 3650ef9aeea49d8238bf2e409ec0885120722b59
Author: merrimanr <merrim...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-08-17T14:36:05Z

    initial commit

commit a4f0ba9008f2d0ee48b8bcd639558ac955249490
Author: merrimanr <merrim...@gmail.com>
Date:   2017-08-17T14:40:51Z

    moved group by test cases to the end

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to