Hi Michael and Casey,

It looks like ES believe Java Rest Client is mature enough to be pushed to
different products at this stage. However, I haven't used it personally. I
will share the question regarding x-pack support with Elasticsearch
engineers to see if there is any issue regarding that.

Cheers,
Ali

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Michael Miklavcic <
michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think there is some level of support for auth via their REST api, but I
> don't see anything specific to X-Pack as you mentioned. However, the major
> reason we did not adopt it at the time of upgrade was because a number of
> features were not available to REST yet and the effort to simultaneously
> upgrade ES and migrate the API to REST was an effort decidedly too large
> for the scope of the PR at the time.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It was my understanding was that ES x-pack only supports the transport
> > client (e.g.
> > https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/x-pack/current/java-clients.html).  I
> > think
> > that was a major reason why we chose to go that route.  I might be wrong
> > though.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:30 AM Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
> > > I have noticed that the recommendation from Elasticsearch team is
> changed
> > > to use Java Rest Client instead of Transport one. The rationale behind
> it
> > > looks convincing and it can also help Metron to be more decoupled from
> > > Elasticsearch roadmap, so Metron users can upgrade Elasticsearch with
> > > minimum dependency to Metron support.
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.elastic.co/blog/state-of-the-official-
> > elasticsearch-java-clients
> > >
> > > P.S: Transport client will be deprecated in ES 7 and will be removed
> > > completely on 8.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ali
> > >
> >
>



-- 
A.Nazemian

Reply via email to