Okay, I'll PR something since I'm looking at it

Jon

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:45 AM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I recall correctly, they were already different, presumably from the
> more manual process, and I wanted keep things close to what they already
> were before trying to clean that sort of thing up. We can definitely unify
> them, and if we need to code in any exceptions to deal with pre-unified
> versions, we can.  It just wasn't high on my priority list.
>
> In the script, the change to the separator itself is easy, but I'd have to
> double check if there's anything else that needs to happen to make sure
> tags and such line up.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:18 AM zeo...@gmail.com <zeo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a reason why the prefix for apache/metron ends with a -, whereas
> > the plugin ends with a _ separator?  I would like to see it more uniform
> > using the _
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:04 AM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > That first half of that page will be rewritten in the next couple days
> to
> > > reflect the script to prepare release candidate; I didn't want to
> change
> > > that page until the PR actually went in.
> > >
> > > The release process, barring the KEYS issue (and a patch to the script
> to
> > > handle the bro plugin tag), is pretty much set to be managed separately
> > at
> > > this point.  The docs just need an overhaul, so someone who's not me
> > knows
> > > what to do.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:01 PM zeo...@gmail.com <zeo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah you're right when I looked closer to make the change it was step
> > 10.
> > > > I pushed a manual 0.2 tag to metron-bro-plugin-kafka and did a quick
> > > update
> > > > to the cwiki, but it could use some additional love, especially if we
> > > want
> > > > to split out the release processes generally.
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:32 PM Justin Leet <justinjl...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah, we need to update the release process instructions. It should
> > > > > actually be step 10 shouldn't it?  We want to keep the rc tag as-is
> > > > because
> > > > > it may get rejected/cancelled, and update the final tag as the
> > > release. I
> > > > > already need to overhaul that page to reflect the addition of the
> RC
> > > > > creation script, so I can also update it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I didn't remember there was a specific reason for the git tagging,
> > so I
> > > > > just followed the convention we used for the main repo, which is
> why
> > we
> > > > > have this problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > The release candidate script also needs to be updated (because it
> > needs
> > > > to
> > > > > know the proper prior tag to pull). It's not hard to do, but we'll
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > > open a Jira and update that portion of the script. It's pretty easy
> > to
> > > > do,
> > > > > it's just the portion here
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/metron/blob/master/dev-utilities/release-utils/prepare-release-candidate#L245
> > > > > >
> > > > > .
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 5:09 PM Michael Miklavcic <
> > > > > michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 to all of that from me, Jon. Thanks for taking care of this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 2:34 PM zeo...@gmail.com <
> zeo...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I wonder if we should also update the
> > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Release+Process
> > > > > > > instructions
> > > > > > > to include tagging for the bro plugin, or if we were going to
> > split
> > > > out
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > release processes?  I'd be happy to update the instructions
> (Step
> > > 8)
> > > > if
> > > > > > > that's the right place for now and I didn't miss a new place
> for
> > > the
> > > > > > plugin
> > > > > > > release instructions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:31 PM zeo...@gmail.com <
> > zeo...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So I was poking around on the plugin today and noticed that
> we
> > > have
> > > > > > > > a apache-metron-bro-plugin-kafka_0.2.0-release and
> > > > > > > apache-metron-bro-plugin-kafka_0.2.0-rc1
> > > > > > > > tag, but no 0.2 (which is what bro-pkg would point to).
> > Anybody
> > > > have
> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > concerns if I push the 0.2 tag as discussed above?  Then we
> > could
> > > > > > update
> > > > > > > > the bro package manager, and finally update what the
> > > apache/metron
> > > > > > > full-dev
> > > > > > > > environment(s) point to (0.2 as opposed to 0.1).  Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 8:41 AM zeo...@gmail.com <
> > > zeo...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> I did a bit of poking around and I don't believe we ever
> > > formally
> > > > > > wrote
> > > > > > > >> that down.  The last release happened as a combination of
> > > actions
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > >> mattf and myself (mostly mattf).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The plugin has two new commits since the last release (1
> > bugfix
> > > 1
> > > > > > > >> feature) - if we want to couple version 0.2 of the plugin
> > with a
> > > > > > metron
> > > > > > > >> 0.5.0 release we would need to make a 0.2 tag against HEAD
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > plugin
> > > > > > > >> repo, then increment the version in the ansible playbooks
> here
> > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/metron/blob/master/metron-deployment/ansible/roles/bro/vars/main.yml#L30
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> .
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Or, if we just want to make a plugin release without
> changing
> > > > > > > >> apache/metron, we could just make a 0.2 tag in the plugin
> > repo,
> > > > and
> > > > > > then
> > > > > > > >> release it in a more disjointed way.  I know that's not
> super
> > > > > helpful
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > >> I don't have documentation for doing an apache release of
> the
> > > > plugin
> > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > >> than hacking something together based on what's out there
> for
> > > > > > > apache/metron.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Reference conversations:
> > > > > > > >>  -
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2606166bd5e864f1b56db302099c9a8042cdadec8fa2692fef49493f@%3Cdev.metron.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > >>  -
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3aecbadbf3353e98c03ca4b680fcd998d0cd2bf5a4319238dd85ae75@%3Cdev.metron.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Jon
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:00 PM Justin Leet <
> > > > justinjl...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> At the risk of exposing my ignorance, do we have the bro
> > plugin
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > >>> process documented anywhere?  We have a doc for the main
> > > release
> > > > (
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Release+Process
> > > > > ),
> > > > > > > >>> but I
> > > > > > > >>> haven't noticed one for the bro plugin.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> For the current RC, it's not included and it wasn't pushed
> > for
> > > > (it
> > > > > > has
> > > > > > > >>> less
> > > > > > > >>> changes for obvious reasons).  However, we should be making
> > > sure
> > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> validate if its necessary to release and having the process
> > > > > > documented.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Justin
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Jon
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> > Jon
> >
>
-- 

Jon

Reply via email to