+1



On September 17, 2019 at 14:53:13, Michael Miklavcic (
michael.miklav...@gmail.com) wrote:

Also, caught this come through the HBase dev list -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23032. Might be worth a look at
4.2.0 while we're at it and possibly also avoid this issue that I was
running into before when trying to use curator-tests 4.x
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-446. Fixed in 4.0.1, which
would naturally be included with 4.2.0 assuming we don't run into any other
classpath or API compatibility issues.

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Nick Allen <n...@nickallen.org> wrote:

> +1 to making the change on the feature branch.
>
> We don't really know how this might affect master which is still building
> against HDP 2.6, nor is it strictly needed there. Going to Curator 4.0.0
> is only needed due to the HDP 3.1 upgrade. This is also likely to get
> more focused testing cycles in the feature branch before it has a chance
to
> break anything in master.
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:13 PM Michael Miklavcic <
> michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > While working through the feature branch upgrade for HDP 3.1, we came
> > across some classpath related issues conflicting with Storm and Guava
> while
> > testing out Kerberos. Initially, this seemed reasonable to roll into
the
> > Kerberos fix PR, but the scope has expanded a bit because we found
> > additional impacts while working through the Hadoop upgrade branch as
> well.
> > We're now looking at splitting this out into a separate PR in the
feature
> > branch. Curator 4.0.0 is backwards compatible and will work with
> Zookeeper
> > 3.4.6. Strictly speaking, this *could* be done against master first,
but
> > there may be some duplicate testing effort there, and I'm really not
it's
> > worth it as there is absolutely no issue currently with Curator 2.12.0
in
> > master - I call this out purely for transparency/information share with
> the
> > community. I'm leaning towards us making this change against the
feature
> > branch directly as that is the only place we currently have
compatibility
> > issues.
> >
> > Best,
> > Mike
> >
>

Reply via email to