+1
On September 17, 2019 at 14:53:13, Michael Miklavcic ( michael.miklav...@gmail.com) wrote: Also, caught this come through the HBase dev list - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23032. Might be worth a look at 4.2.0 while we're at it and possibly also avoid this issue that I was running into before when trying to use curator-tests 4.x https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-446. Fixed in 4.0.1, which would naturally be included with 4.2.0 assuming we don't run into any other classpath or API compatibility issues. On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:20 AM Nick Allen <n...@nickallen.org> wrote: > +1 to making the change on the feature branch. > > We don't really know how this might affect master which is still building > against HDP 2.6, nor is it strictly needed there. Going to Curator 4.0.0 > is only needed due to the HDP 3.1 upgrade. This is also likely to get > more focused testing cycles in the feature branch before it has a chance to > break anything in master. > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:13 PM Michael Miklavcic < > michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > While working through the feature branch upgrade for HDP 3.1, we came > > across some classpath related issues conflicting with Storm and Guava > while > > testing out Kerberos. Initially, this seemed reasonable to roll into the > > Kerberos fix PR, but the scope has expanded a bit because we found > > additional impacts while working through the Hadoop upgrade branch as > well. > > We're now looking at splitting this out into a separate PR in the feature > > branch. Curator 4.0.0 is backwards compatible and will work with > Zookeeper > > 3.4.6. Strictly speaking, this *could* be done against master first, but > > there may be some duplicate testing effort there, and I'm really not it's > > worth it as there is absolutely no issue currently with Curator 2.12.0 in > > master - I call this out purely for transparency/information share with > the > > community. I'm leaning towards us making this change against the feature > > branch directly as that is the only place we currently have compatibility > > issues. > > > > Best, > > Mike > > >