Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/201#discussion_r71881414
--- Diff: metron-deployment/packaging/docker/rpm-docker/SPECS/metron.spec
---
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ Source2:
metron-elasticsearch-%{full_version}-archive.tar.gz
Source3: metron-data-management-%{full_version}-archive.tar.gz
Source4: metron-solr-%{full_version}-archive.tar.gz
Source5: metron-enrichment-%{full_version}-archive.tar.gz
-Source6: metron-pcap-backend-%{full_version}-archive.tar.gz
+Source6: metron-indexing-%{full_version}-archive.tar.gz
--- End diff --
So, is the Source${x} naming convention imposed by spec? Seems like we
might have the opportunity to name things more descriptively. I don't mind it
for this PR and it's not a big thing..I'm just curious.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
