Nick, sorry, correction on that. >Alternatives are svnpubsub or (apparently, though >I don't see a way to request it) gitpubsub.
Can we please use gitpubsub (assuming it is as fast as svnpubsub) and assuming you find a way to request it. >Regarding repos, I presume we want to use git Yes. >That can be set up to >be visible on github and to accept patches/pull requests >from there. Should we go ahead with that? Yes please. >For bug/issue tracking we have a choice of bugzilla or jira. >Any strong views one way or the other? JIRA please. Must be JIRA (holds nose). Thanks! Brian On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > We have three questions to consider regarding bootstrapping > milagro infrastructure at apache: > - Website > - Repos > - Bug tracking > > > First, the website. I put in a request to bootstrap > with the Apache CMS. I have heard today that they are > currently reluctant to sign up new projects with the > CMS. Alternatives are svnpubsub or (apparently, though > I don't see a way to request it) gitpubsub. > > It is possible but not certain the situation with the > CMS may be clearer very soon (next week). Should we > wait, or get started with svnpubsub? > > > Regarding repos, I presume we want to use git, but we'll > need to migrate to Apache git. That can be set up to > be visible on github and to accept patches/pull requests > from there. Should we go ahead with that? > > > For bug/issue tracking we have a choice of bugzilla or jira. > Any strong views one way or the other? > > > -- > Nick Kew >
