> On 03 Feb 2016, at 12:44, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 00:32 +0000, Brian Spector wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> we need to modify some language on the Apache Proposal that is causing a >> lot of concern amongst a few potential community members. I just heard of >> this tonight but want to make sure we nip this in the bud. > > It seems a strange problem to have, and I've been thinking > about it. I can't help thinking, the solution should be > that the proposal document fades into insignificance as > the project's own website becomes our public face. > > I guess we can strike that language and add a pointer to > your post as explanation.
^^ that would be my suggestion as well. We might consider adding it as possible FAQ (or state it somewhere) on the website to avoid possible confusion and questions in the future... -- Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect +31 631 765 814 My world is something with Amdatu and Apache Luminis Technologies Churchillplein 1 7314 BZ Apeldoorn +31 88 586 46 00 https://www.luminis.eu KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93 BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
