Everyone, it is our intention to have an automated form on the Milagro Project (incubating) website that will auto-enrol anyone into the Milagro Slack.
There are numerous open source projects that have done this, it's not magic. Let's get the question of the Grav answered first and then we will address this in a way that is available to us. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Tomasz Matecki <[email protected]> wrote: > Welcome Anthony! > > In terms of Slack - you should receive an invitation very soon, so you’ll > not be outside anymore - sorry for that. > At the beginning Slack Milagro channel purpose was to discuss our internal > Miracl engagement and that is why it was not public. > > I get your point with archive which is not accessible for ASF - maybe we > can raise a discussion here about using a Slack in future? > > Regards > Tom > > > > On 5 Apr 2016, at 23:23, anthony shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks Nick, > > > > I was going to ask, where the discussions are happening? I saw a note > > about Slack. Slack is not appropriate as a form of community > > discussion as: > > 1) The current Slack system that is linked on the website is only > > available to MIRACL employees! https://milagro.slack.com/signup > > 2) All discussion should be part of a public archive- > > http://apache.org/foundation/public-archives.html Slack message > > history is proprietary to Slack, the ASF and the community get no > > visibility. > > > > I think I'm the only one on the PPMC that isn't a MIRACL employee and > > it very much feels like I'm on the outside at the moment, I'd like to > > contribute but not really sure where to start. > > > > Regards > > Anthony > > > > P.S. If anyone is at ApacheCon next month, send me an email > > [email protected] and I'd like to catch up and say hi. > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Peter Scanlon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Nick. > >> > >> Thanks for the note. My focus is on communication and branding. > Please LMK anytime you see a violation of the correct Apache trademark use. > >> > >> We will endeavor to always follow the examples you've identified below, > and may resort to shorthand 'MILAGRO' within a paragraph or description > for the purpose of simplification. > >> > >> Thank you > >> Peter Scanlon, CMO > >> MIRACL > >> > >> > >>> On 05 Apr 2016, at 13:53, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Folks, > >>> > >>> If we're to become an Apache project, we need to start > >>> working like one. Most importantly right now, it means > >>> all that we do needs to be on-record at Apache. That > >>> record includes Jira and Git repos, but the primary > >>> focus is this mailinglist. Can we please start to > >>> get into the habit of using it? > >>> > >>> We've been stalled over importing git repos to Apache. > >>> About the time the Miracl software grant was submitted, > >>> I was asked off-list to delay importing until some names > >>> had been changed to avoid possible collisions with > >>> Miracl's intellectual property. I've been rather out > >>> of action, but I should've kept track of the progress > >>> of that. Are we in fact all ready to go now? > >>> > >>> Finally, also based on off-list interaction, I should > >>> once again emphasize the importance of due regard for > >>> the Apache trademark. The project cannot be described > >>> as "Apache Milagro" until it graduates from the incubator. > >>> Variants like "Apache Milagro (incubating)", or > >>> "The Milagro project, currently in incubation at Apache" > >>> are fine. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Nick Kew > > -- Brian Spector CEO MIRACL T: +44 (0) 20 3389 8190 https://www.miracl.com 81 Rivington Street London UK, EC2A 3AY Registered in England and Wales 7017635
