Both tagging and a global project are possible that hovers up all the issues. I’m just worried that if we as a group start trying to have multiple project boards if that doesn’t become overly complex. I think it would.
Are we happy enough to just go with one global project board, multiple repos with issues on each repo and the global project board hoovering up issues from each repo? Thanks Brian ________________________________ From: Kealan McCusker <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 9:51 am To: [email protected] Subject: Re: GitHub Project Boards Hi All What about if we have one project per repo and the issues are also present in the global board? I think Giogio's suggestion of tagging is a good idea. Regards Kealan On Sun 16 Jun 2019, 03:02 Giorgio Zoppi, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > can be per project type? Specify the project type in the issues...and tag > as does envoy. > here https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/issues > tagging per priority as well. Do you have in mind already an issue > template? > > > > > El sáb., 15 jun. 2019 a las 19:49, Brian Spector (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > Hi All, > > > > In addition to moving to GitHub issues (which was overwhelmingly voted > > for), contributors and devs have mentioned they would like to start > > using a project board which we would locate on incubator-milagro-crypto > > that could hoover up all the issues from the various different project > > boards under the Milagro umbrella. > > > > I think we need to think about the organization of our issues and also > > implement some issue templates, which can be standard off the shelf that > > GitHub recommends. > > > > Does anyone have issue with this suggestion before we move to GitHub > > issues? > > > > Thanks > > Brian > > > > > > -- > Life is a chess game - Anonymous. >
