Once understood, this design is really a beauty to me! Thx to mina again!
Trustin Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > On 3/21/07, Coding Horse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, Trustin, >> >> I really appreciate your wonderful explanation! Could you also shed some >> light on this case when you have time: >> >> When decodable() is called there are 3.5 complete packets of MyPacket, my >> decode() implementation will take out each complete MyPacket and leave >> the >> remaining untouched to wait for more data. In my previous post I said I >> just took out exact one MyPacket and return OK - I didn't care how many >> MyPacket are inside current buffer as long as it contains at least one >> complete MyPacket. It seems to work for me because I found inside >> decodable() the buffer position was adjusted automatically by one >> MyPacket >> after I "get" one MyPacket out in decode(). I just want to know if this >> is >> the recommended way to achieve what I expected. > > Yes, it's the recommended way. Please decode one message at once in > decode() implementation. MINA will call decodable() and decode() > again if there's more to decode. > > HTH, > Trustin > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/A-question-about-implementing-MessageDecoder-tf3422797.html#a9586609 Sent from the mina dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
